GROK EVIDENCE II

1. PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records)
– **URL**: [https://www.pacer.gov/](https://www.pacer.gov/)
– **Purpose**: Access U.S. federal court records to identify litigation involving U.S.-based entities linked to Spain’s Democratic Memory Law.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”Spain” AND “public procurement” OR “Democratic Memory Law”`
– Additional terms: `”contract fragmentation” OR “historical research”`
– Filters: District Courts, civil case type, date range (2022–2025)
– **Relevance**: Find precedents or cases showing U.S. contractor involvement in Spanish procurement, supporting claims of unfair competition.

#### 2. USAspending.gov
– **URL**: [https://www.usaspending.gov/](https://www.usaspending.gov/)
– **Purpose**: Track U.S. federal spending to identify contracts related to historical research or Spanish procurement.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”Spain” AND “historical research” OR “Democratic Memory Law”`
– Additional terms: `”procurement” OR “research funding”`
– Filters: Agency (e.g., Department of State), contract type, date range (2022–2025)
– **Relevance**: Evidence of U.S.-Spain collaboration or funding could indicate competitive irregularities in contract allocation.

#### 3. WIPO Brand Database
– **URL**: [https://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/](https://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/)
– **Purpose**: Search international trademarks tied to historical research or cultural services in Spanish procurement.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”Spain” AND “historical research” OR “Democratic Memory Law”`
– Additional terms: `”procurement” OR “research services”`
– Filters: Country (Spain, UK), trademark type, date range (2022–2025)
– **Relevance**: Trademarks linked to contractors could reveal market presence or branding efforts tied to biased procurement practices.

#### 4. Open Ownership Register
– **URL**: [https://www.openownership.org/en/register/](https://www.openownership.org/en/register/)
– **Purpose**: Identify beneficial owners of entities involved in Spanish procurement.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”Spain” AND “historical research” OR “Democratic Memory Law”`
– Additional terms: `”procurement contracts” OR “research funding”`
– Filters: Country (Spain), entity type, date range (2022–2025)
– **Relevance**: Ownership data might expose conflicts of interest or favoritism, bolstering illegal contract fragmentation claims.

#### 5. Infocif.es
– **URL**: [https://www.infocif.es/](https://www.infocif.es/)
– **Purpose**: Access Spanish company registry data to investigate entities tied to the Democratic Memory Law.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”investigación histórica” AND “Ley de Memoria Democrática”`
– Additional terms: `”contratos públicos” OR “financiación de investigación”`
– Filters: Province, sector (research services), date range (2022–2025)
– **Relevance**: Financial and affiliation details of contractors could support allegations of unfair competition.

#### 6. Oficina Conflicto Intereses (Spanish Conflict of Interest Office)
– **URL**: [https://www.hacienda.gob.es/es-ES/…/Paginas/DeclaracionesdealtoscargosdelaAGE.aspx](https://www.hacienda.gob.es/es-ES/SecretariaDeEstadoDeFuncionPublica/OficinaConflictoIntereses/Paginas/DeclaracionesdealtoscargosdelaAGE.aspx)
– **Purpose**: Review declarations of Spanish officials for procurement-related conflicts.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”Ley de Memoria Democrática” OR “investigación histórica”`
– Additional terms: `”contratos públicos” OR “adjudicaciones”`
– Filters: Official role, department, date range (2022–2025)
– **Relevance**: Evidence of undue influence could substantiate claims of illegal contract fragmentation.

#### 7. Congreso de Diputados (Spanish Congress of Deputies)
– **URL**: [https://www.congresodiputados.es/](https://www.congresodiputados.es/)
– **Purpose**: Access parliamentary debates on the Democratic Memory Law and procurement.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”Ley de Memoria Democrática” AND “contratación pública”`
– Additional terms: `”fragmentación de contratos” OR “investigación histórica”`
– Filters: Session date (2022–2025), committee, keyword
– **Relevance**: Parliamentary concerns could highlight negligent misrepresentation or procurement issues.

#### 8. CNMV (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores)
– **URL**: [https://www.cnmv.es/](https://www.cnmv.es/)
– **Purpose**: Investigate listed Spanish companies involved in procurement.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”investigación histórica” OR “Ley de Memoria Democrática”`
– Additional terms: `”contratos públicos” OR “financiación”`
– Filters: Company, sector, date range (2022–2025)
– **Relevance**: Market disclosures might reveal contractor involvement or impacts, supporting unfair competition claims.

#### 9. CNMC (Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia)
– **URL**: [https://www.cnmc.es/](https://www.cnmc.es/)
– **Purpose**: Review investigations into procurement or competition violations.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”contratación pública” AND “fragmentación” OR “Ley de Memoria Democrática”`
– Additional terms: `”competencia desleal” OR “abuso de posición dominante”`
– Filters: Sector (research services), case type, date range (2022–2025)
– **Relevance**: Anti-competitive findings could directly support allegations of unfair practices.

#### 10. Transparencia Generalitat de Catalunya
– **URL**: [https://transparencia.gencat.cat/](https://transparencia.gencat.cat/)
– **Purpose**: Examine regional procurement and funding for historical research.
– **Search Approach**:
– Search terms: `”investigació històrica” AND “Llei de Memòria Democràtica”`
– Additional terms: `”contractes públics” OR “finançament de recerca”`
– Filters: Department, sector, date range (2022–2025)
– **Relevance**: Regional irregularities could reinforce claims of illegal contract fragmentation.

—

### Artifact with Compiled Search Strategies

# Search Strategies for CoCoo’s Case Against Spain’s Democratic Memory Law

## Overview
These search strategies are designed to uncover evidence of illegal contract fragmentation and biased historical reporting in CoCoo’s case against the Spanish government’s Democratic Memory Law. Each resource is paired with tailored search terms and filters to support allegations of unfair competition and procurement irregularities.

—

## 1. PACER (U.S. Federal Court Records)
– **URL**: [https://www.pacer.gov/](https://www.pacer.gov/)
– **Search Terms**: `”Spain” AND “public procurement” OR “Democratic Memory Law”`, `”contract fragmentation” OR “historical research”`
– **Filters**: District Courts, civil cases, 2022–2025
– **Goal**: Identify U.S.-Spain litigation precedents or contractor involvement.

## 2. USAspending.gov (U.S. Federal Spending)
– **URL**: [https://www.usaspending.gov/](https://www.usaspending.gov/)
– **Search Terms**: `”Spain” AND “historical research” OR “Democratic Memory Law”`, `”procurement” OR “research funding”`
– **Filters**: Agency (e.g., Dept. of State), contract type, 2022–2025
– **Goal**: Find U.S.-Spain funding ties indicating competitive irregularities.

## 3. WIPO Brand Database (International Trademarks)
– **URL**: [https://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/](https://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/)
– **Search Terms**: `”Spain” AND “historical research” OR “Democratic Memory Law”`, `”procurement” OR “research services”`
– **Filters**: Country (Spain, UK), trademark type, 2022–2025
– **Goal**: Reveal contractor branding linked to procurement bias.

## 4. Open Ownership Register (Beneficial Ownership)
– **URL**: [https://www.openownership.org/en/register/](https://www.openownership.org/en/register/)
– **Search Terms**: `”Spain” AND “historical research” OR “Democratic Memory Law”`, `”procurement contracts” OR “research funding”`
– **Filters**: Country (Spain), entity type, 2022–2025
– **Goal**: Expose ownership conflicts supporting fragmentation claims.

## 5. Infocif.es (Spanish Company Registry)
– **URL**: [https://www.infocif.es/](https://www.infocif.es/)
– **Search Terms**: `”investigación histórica” AND “Ley de Memoria Democrática”`, `”contratos públicos” OR “financiación de investigación”`
– **Filters**: Province, research services sector, 2022–2025
– **Goal**: Uncover contractor affiliations and financials.

## 6. Oficina Conflicto Intereses (Conflict of Interest Office)
– **URL**: [https://www.hacienda.gob.es/…/DeclaracionesdealtoscargosdelaAGE.aspx](https://www.hacienda.gob.es/es-ES/SecretariaDeEstadoDeFuncionPublica/OficinaConflictoIntereses/Paginas/DeclaracionesdealtoscargosdelaAGE.aspx)
– **Search Terms**: `”Ley de Memoria Democrática” OR “investigación histórica”`, `”contratos públicos” OR “adjudicaciones”`
– **Filters**: Official role, department, 2022–2025
– **Goal**: Identify undue influence in procurement decisions.

## 7. Congreso de Diputados (Spanish Parliament)
– **URL**: [https://www.congresodiputados.es/](https://www.congresodiputados.es/)
– **Search Terms**: `”Ley de Memoria Democrática” AND “contratación pública”`, `”fragmentación de contratos” OR “investigación histórica”`
– **Filters**: Session date (2022–2025), committee, keyword
– **Goal**: Highlight parliamentary scrutiny of misrepresentation.

## 8. CNMV (Spanish Securities Regulator)
– **URL**: [https://www.cnmv.es/](https://www.cnmv.es/)
– **Search Terms**: `”investigación histórica” OR “Ley de Memoria Democrática”`, `”contratos públicos” OR “financiación”`
– **Filters**: Company, sector, 2022–2025
– **Goal**: Detect market impacts or contractor disclosures.

## 9. CNMC (Spanish Competition Authority)
– **URL**: [https://www.cnmc.es/](https://www.cnmc.es/)
– **Search Terms**: `”contratación pública” AND “fragmentación” OR “Ley de Memoria Democrática”`, `”competencia desleal” OR “abuso de posición dominante”`
– **Filters**: Research services sector, case type, 2022–2025
– **Goal**: Find anti-competitive evidence supporting unfair practices.

## 10. Transparencia Generalitat de Catalunya (Catalonia Transparency)
– **URL**: [https://transparencia.gencat.cat/](https://transparencia.gencat.cat/)
– **Search Terms**: `”investigació històrica” AND “Llei de Memòria Democràtica”`, `”contractes públics” OR “finançament de recerca”`
– **Filters**: Department, sector, 2022–2025
– **Goal**: Reveal regional procurement irregularities.

—

## Next Steps
Use these strategies to gather evidence of illegal contract fragmentation, unfair competition, and biased historical reporting. Cross-reference findings across platforms to build a robust case.

—

These tailored search strategies should help CoCoo systematically investigate and substantiate their allegations against the Spanish government’s Democratic Memory Law procurement practices. Let me know if you need further assistance refining these approaches!

---

The AJ Bell investment trusts platform at the address ending in ajbell.co.uk/markets/investment-trusts provides data on UK investment trusts, including those in sectors relevant to historical research or cultural services, useful for identifying UK firms harmed by Spanish procurement practices, supporting the causes of responsibility patrimonial and unfair competition. The web results indicate AJ Bell offers access to investment trusts and market data, suggesting a screener tool for filtering by sector and performance. The search strategy should use the platform’s screener with terms like “historical research” OR “cultural heritage” AND “investment trusts” to identify trusts investing in firms affected by the Democratic Memory Law’s procurement. Combine with financial metrics such as “revenue decline” OR “market exclusion” to pinpoint trusts with exposure to SMEs harmed by Spanish contracts. If advanced filters are available, select sectors aligning with SIC codes 7220 (research) or 9102 (heritage), and date range 2022-2025 for recent financial impacts. Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “procurement harm”, and OR to include synonyms like “heritage consultancy” OR “research funding”. This approach aims to uncover trusts linked to affected UK firms, supporting the finding of unfair competition by evidencing economic harm and aiding CoCoo’s claimant recruitment.[](https://www.ajbell.co.uk/markets/latestnews)

—

The UK government publications platform at the address ending in gov.uk/government/publications hosts official reports, policy papers, and transparency data, critical for identifying UK government responses to the Democratic Memory Law or evidence of UK businesses affected by Spanish procurement, supporting the causes of judicial review and negligent misrepresentation. The web results confirm its role as a repository for government documents, suggesting comprehensive search capabilities. The search strategy should use exact phrases like “Democratic Memory Law” AND “UK citizens” OR “Spanish Civil War” AND “procurement” to find reports on historical misrepresentation or cross-border contract issues. Combine with terms such as “contract fragmentation” OR “SMEs excluded” to uncover transparency data on procurement harms. If advanced options allow, filter by department (e.g., Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office), document type (policy papers, transparency data), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “reputational harm”, and OR to include synonyms like “biased reporting” OR “cultural contracts”. This approach seeks policy or economic impact reports, supporting the finding of negligent misrepresentation and strengthening CoCoo’s public campaign narrative.[](https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-engine-for-growth-package-announced-as-defence-secretary-closes-london-stock-exchange)

—

The UK government organisations platform at the address ending in gov.uk/government/organisations lists UK public bodies, useful for identifying agencies involved in UK-Spain relations or procurement oversight, supporting the causes of judicial review and responsibility patrimonial. The web results highlight its role in detailing government entities, suggesting a directory-style search. The search strategy should use terms like “Foreign Office” AND “Spain” OR “Democratic Memory Law” to find agencies addressing historical or procurement issues. Combine with phrases such as “procurement oversight” OR “SMEs” AND “cross-border contracts” to identify bodies like the Department for Business and Trade. If advanced filters are available, select organisations by function (foreign affairs, trade), and date for recent activities (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “procurement irregularities”, and OR to include synonyms like “historical research” OR “cultural funding”. This approach aims to uncover relevant agencies for transparency requests, supporting the finding of unfair competition and informing CoCoo’s advocacy strategy.[](https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-engine-for-growth-package-announced-as-defence-secretary-closes-london-stock-exchange)

—

The London Stock Exchange price explorer at the address ending in londonstockexchange.com/live-markets/market-data-dashboard/price-explorer provides real-time data on UK-listed companies, crucial for identifying SMEs in historical research or cultural sectors harmed by Spanish procurement, supporting the causes of responsibility patrimonial and unfair competition. The web results confirm its role in tracking market data, suggesting a robust search interface. The search strategy should use terms like “historical research” OR “cultural heritage” AND “UK companies” to screen for listed firms. Combine with financial metrics like “share price decline” OR “market exclusion” to identify SMEs affected by lost Spanish contracts. If advanced filters allow, select sectors (SIC 7220 for research, 9102 for heritage), market (AIM for SMEs), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “procurement harm”, and OR to include synonyms like “heritage consultancy” OR “research funding”. This approach seeks evidence of economic harm, supporting the finding of unfair competition and aiding CoCoo’s claimant recruitment.[](https://www.londonstockexchange.com/)

—

The Bidstats platform at the address ending in bidstats.uk aggregates UK public sector contract data, essential for identifying tenders related to historical research or UK-Spain collaborations, supporting the causes of responsibility patrimonial and unfair competition. The web results do not directly reference Bidstats, but its purpose aligns with procurement tracking. The search strategy should use phrases like “historical research” AND “Spain” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “tenders” to find relevant contract notices. Combine with terms such as “SMEs excluded” OR “contract fragmentation” to identify discriminatory practices. If advanced options allow, filter by CPV codes (e.g., 92312000 for archival services), authority (e.g., Foreign Office), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “procurement irregularities”, and OR to include synonyms like “cultural services” OR “research contracts”. This approach aims to uncover exclusionary tenders, supporting the finding of unfair competition and guiding CoCoo’s claimant outreach.

—

The WTO dispute settlement platform at the address ending in wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm documents trade disputes, relevant for CoCoo’s Indonesian biodiesel campaign and potentially the Democratic Memory Law if procurement practices violated WTO rules, supporting the cause of violation of WTO trade rules. The web results confirm its role in tracking disputes, suggesting a case database. The search strategy should use terms like “Spain” AND “public procurement” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “trade barriers” to find disputes involving Spanish contracts. Combine with phrases such as “contract fragmentation” OR “SMEs exclusion” to align with case specifics. If advanced filters are available, select respondent (Spain), agreement (GATT Article III.4), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “procurement dispute”, and OR to include synonyms like “tender splitting” OR “biased awards”. This approach seeks evidence of trade violations, supporting the finding of unfair competition and informing CoCoo’s mediation proposals.

—

The U.S. Office of Government Ethics platform at the address ending in oge.gov focuses on U.S. government ethics, with limited direct relevance but potential for identifying U.S. firms involved in Spanish procurement, supporting the cause of unfair competition. The web results do not reference OGE, but it likely includes ethics disclosures. The search strategy should use terms like “Spain” AND “procurement” OR “historical research” AND “U.S. companies” to find disclosures involving Spanish contracts. Combine with phrases such as “Democratic Memory Law” OR “contract awards” to narrow to case-relevant issues. If advanced options allow, filter by agency (e.g., Department of Commerce), disclosure type (financial interests), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “contract influence”, and OR to include synonyms like “research funding” OR “cultural contracts”. This approach seeks evidence of U.S. contractor involvement, supporting the finding of unfair competition and aiding CoCoo’s international strategy.

—

The U.S. Congress platform at the address ending in congress.gov provides legislative records, marginally relevant for identifying U.S. policy discussions on Spanish historical narratives or procurement, supporting the cause of negligent misrepresentation. The web results mention congressional hearings, suggesting searchable records. The search strategy should use terms like “Spain” AND “Spanish Civil War” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “historical accuracy” to find relevant bills or hearings. Combine with phrases such as “procurement” OR “reputational harm” to align with case specifics. If advanced filters are available, select document type (hearings, reports), committee (Foreign Affairs), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “historical narrative”, and OR to include synonyms like “biased reporting” OR “cultural contracts”. This approach seeks U.S. policy evidence, supporting the finding of negligent misrepresentation and enhancing CoCoo’s public campaign.[](https://www.ajbell.co.uk/markets/latestnews)

—

The Espacenet patent database at the address ending in worldwide.espacenet.com covers global patent filings, less directly relevant but potentially useful for identifying patents related to historical research tools used in Spanish contracts, supporting the cause of unfair competition. The web results do not reference Espacenet, but it likely includes advanced search capabilities. The search strategy should use terms like “historical research” AND “Spain” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “technology” to find patents linked to procurement. Combine with phrases such as “research tools” OR “contract awards” to narrow to relevant innovations. If advanced options allow, filter by country (Spain, UK), patent type (granted), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “procurement technology”, and OR to include synonyms like “cultural research” OR “archival tools”. This approach seeks evidence of contractor advantages, supporting the finding of unfair competition and informing CoCoo’s litigation strategy.

—

The USPTO patent database at the address ending in ppubs.uspto.gov tracks U.S. patent filings, similarly marginal but useful for identifying U.S.-based contractors in Spanish procurement, supporting the cause of unfair competition. The web results do not reference USPTO, but it likely offers robust search tools. The search strategy should use terms like “Spain” AND “historical research” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “patents” to find relevant filings. Combine with phrases such as “procurement” OR “research technology” to align with case specifics. If advanced filters are available, select country (U.S., Spain), patent type (granted), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “contract technology”, and OR to include synonyms like “cultural tools” OR “research funding”. This approach seeks evidence of U.S. contractor involvement, supporting the finding of unfair competition and aiding CoCoo’s international claimant outreach.

—

I must emphasize that I cannot access these platforms, read their content, or execute searches due to my limitations. CoCoo must manually implement these searches, logging results as per the SEARCHLINK Model’s protocols. Clarification on CoCoo’s access to these platforms, existing search results, or specific contractor names would refine these strategies. Please confirm CoCoo’s legal standing and any preliminary evidence to prioritize searches. I’ve incorporated web results where relevant (e.g., for AJ Bell, UK government platforms), citing appropriately, and critically examined the data to align with CoCoo’s objectives, ensuring precise and strategic responses.

---

The Register of Consultant Lobbyists platform at the address ending in gov.uk/government/publications/register-of-consultant-lobbyists is maintained by the Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists (ORCL) under the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Act 2014 to track consultant lobbyists engaging with UK ministers or permanent secretaries. It is relevant for CoCoo’s case to identify UK lobbying firms or individuals influencing Spanish procurement policies related to the Democratic Memory Law, supporting the causes of unfair competition and judicial review by uncovering potential undue influence. The search strategy should leverage the platform’s search function, as noted in the web results, using exact phrases like “Spain” AND “historical research” OR “Democratic Memory Law” to find lobbyists representing Spanish entities or research contractors. Combine with terms such as “procurement” OR “contract awards” to detect lobbying on tender processes. If advanced options allow, filter by client name, sector (research or cultural services, SIC 7220), and date (2022-2025, aligning with the law’s enactment). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “lobbying”, and OR to include synonyms such as “tender influence” OR “cultural contracts”. The web results indicate quarterly information returns (QIRs) list clients and lobbying activities, so searches should target QIRs for transparency on who was lobbied and on what subject. This approach aims to uncover evidence of lobbying that may have skewed contract awards, supporting the finding of unfair competition and informing CoCoo’s mediation strategy by highlighting political influences.[](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/registrar-of-consultant-lobbyists-statement-of-accounts-2023-to-2024/office-of-the-registrar-of-consultant-lobbyists-statement-of-accounts-2023-24-html)[](https://registrarofconsultantlobbyists.org.uk/)

—

The Scottish Lobbying Register at the address ending in lobbying.scot is administered by the Scottish Parliament under the Lobbying (Scotland) Act 2016 to track regulated lobbying activities, including communications with MSPs or ministers. It is less directly relevant but could reveal Scottish organizations or individuals lobbying on issues related to the Democratic Memory Law, particularly if UK-Scottish interests overlap with Spanish historical narratives, supporting the cause of unfair competition. The search strategy should use phrases like “Spanish Civil War” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “Scotland” to identify relevant lobbying records. Combine with terms such as “historical research” OR “procurement” to find activities influencing contract awards. If advanced filters are available, select organization type (consultancy, research), activity type (meetings, correspondence), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “lobbying influence”, and OR to include synonyms like “cultural funding” OR “heritage contracts”. The web results note stricter Scottish regulations, suggesting detailed registration data, which should be exploited to map networks. This approach seeks evidence of lobbying impacting procurement, supporting the finding of unfair competition and aiding CoCoo’s campaign to expose undue influence.[](https://www.parliament.scot/get-involved/lobbying/lobbying-register)[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobbying_in_the_United_Kingdom)

—

The Case Tracker platform at the address ending in casetracker.justice.gov.uk, managed by HM Courts & Tribunals Service, tracks UK court cases, particularly in the Business and Property Courts, and is crucial for identifying litigation involving UK entities affected by Spanish procurement, supporting the causes of judicial review, tort of unfair competition, and responsibility patrimonial. The search strategy should use terms like “Spain” AND “procurement” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “UK businesses” to find cases on cross-border contract disputes. Combine with phrases such as “contract fragmentation” OR “reputational harm” to align with CoCoo’s allegations. If advanced options allow, filter by court (High Court, Chancery Division), case type (competition, administrative), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “unfair tendering”, and OR to include synonyms like “biased contracts” OR “historical research disputes”. The web results confirm the platform’s role in case tracking, suggesting detailed case metadata. This approach aims to uncover UK litigation precedents, supporting the finding of unfair competition and guiding CoCoo’s litigation strategy.[](https://www.justice.gov.uk/)

—

The Royal Courts of Justice Cause List at the address ending in gov.uk/government/publications/royal-courts-of-justice-cause-list provides daily schedules of cases in the UK’s senior courts, relevant for identifying ongoing or upcoming disputes related to Spanish procurement or reputational harm, supporting the causes of judicial review and negligent misrepresentation. The search strategy should use the platform’s search function with terms like “Spain” AND “procurement” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “reputational damage” to find listed cases. Combine with phrases such as “historical research” OR “contract awards” to narrow to relevant disputes. If advanced filters are available, select court (High Court, Administrative Court), case status (active), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “competition law”, and OR to include synonyms like “unfair tendering” OR “biased reporting”. The web results indicate daily updates, so searches should focus on recent lists. This approach seeks active cases to monitor, supporting the finding of negligent misrepresentation and informing CoCoo’s legal filings.

—

The Find a Tender platform at the address ending in find-tender.service.gov.uk is the UK’s public procurement portal, essential for identifying tenders related to historical research or cultural services that UK firms may have been excluded from, supporting the causes of responsibility patrimonial and unfair competition. The search strategy should use exact phrases like “historical research” AND “Spain” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “tenders” to find relevant contract notices. Combine with terms such as “SMEs excluded” OR “contract fragmentation” to identify discriminatory practices. If advanced options allow, filter by country (Spain, via EU-UK trade agreements), CPV codes (e.g., 92312000 for archival services), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “procurement irregularities”, and OR to include synonyms like “cultural services” OR “research contracts”. The SEARCHLINK Model’s Protocol 2.5 emphasizes CPV code filtering, which should be applied here. This approach aims to uncover evidence of exclusionary tenders, supporting the finding of unfair competition and aiding CoCoo’s claimant recruitment.

—

The LobbyFacts platform at the address ending in lobbyfacts.eu is a database of EU Transparency Register data, tracking lobbyists influencing EU institutions, crucial for identifying entities lobbying on Spanish procurement or historical research policies, supporting the cause of unfair competition. The search strategy should use phrases like “Spain” AND “public procurement” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “lobbying” to find registered lobbyists. Combine with terms such as “historical research” OR “contract awards” to align with case specifics. If advanced filters are available, select country (Spain), sector (research, cultural services), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “lobby influence”, and OR to include synonyms like “tender lobbying” OR “cultural funding”. The web results note that data is self-declared, requiring cross-verification, but highlight powerful search capabilities. This approach seeks evidence of undue influence on EU procurement policies, supporting the finding of unfair competition and enhancing CoCoo’s mediation leverage.[](https://www.lobbyfacts.eu/)

—

The European Commission Press Corner at the address ending in ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/home/en publishes press releases and statements, vital for tracking infringement proceedings or statements on Spain’s procurement practices, supporting the causes of breach of EU public procurement law and state aid rules. The search strategy should use terms like “Spain” AND “procurement violation” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “infringement” to find relevant announcements. Combine with phrases such as “contract fragmentation” OR “RRF” AND “state aid” to cover CoCoo’s Case 83559. If advanced options allow, filter by topic (competition, public procurement), language (English, Spanish), and date (2020-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “transparency breach”, and OR to include synonyms like “tender splitting” OR “biased awards”. The web results suggest frequent updates, so searches should prioritize recent releases. This approach aims to uncover Commission actions, supporting the finding of illegal contract fragmentation and strengthening CoCoo’s EU advocacy.

—

The EU Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platform at the address ending in ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr facilitates consumer dispute resolution, less directly relevant but potentially useful for identifying complaints against Spanish entities involved in procurement, supporting the cause of unfair competition. The search strategy should use terms like “Spain” AND “procurement services” OR “historical research” AND “consumer complaints” to find disputes involving contractors. Combine with phrases such as “Democratic Memory Law” OR “contract awards” to narrow to case-relevant issues. If advanced filters are available, select country (Spain), sector (research services), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “dispute”, and OR to include synonyms like “unfair tendering” OR “biased contracts”. This approach seeks evidence of contractor misconduct, supporting the finding of unfair competition and informing CoCoo’s claimant outreach.

—

The Your Europe Tenders platform at the address ending in europa.eu/youreurope/business/finance-funding/getting-funding/tenders/index_en.htm provides guidance on EU public procurement and access to tenders, critical for identifying opportunities or barriers faced by UK SMEs in Spanish markets, supporting the causes of responsibility patrimonial and unfair competition. The search strategy should use terms like “Spain” AND “public procurement” OR “Democratic Memory Law” AND “tenders” to find guidance or case studies on Spanish practices. Combine with phrases such as “SMEs” AND “exclusion” OR “contract fragmentation” to identify discriminatory barriers. If advanced filters are available, select country (Spain), topic (procurement rules), and date (2022-2025). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “procurement barriers”, and OR to include synonyms like “research contracts” OR “cultural tenders”. This approach aims to uncover evidence of exclusionary practices, supporting the finding of unfair competition and guiding CoCoo’s USP for mediation.

—

The AJ Bell Shares Screener at the address ending in ajbell.co.uk/market-research/screener/shares is a financial tool for analyzing UK-listed companies, marginally relevant for identifying UK SMEs in historical research sectors affected by Spanish procurement, supporting the causes of responsibility patrimonial and unfair competition. The search strategy should use terms like “historical research” OR “cultural services” AND “UK companies” to screen for relevant firms. Combine with financial metrics like “revenue decline” OR “market exclusion” to identify SMEs harmed by lost Spanish contracts. If advanced filters allow, select SIC codes (7220 for research, 9102 for heritage), market (AIM for SMEs), and date (2022-2025 for financial data). Use Boolean operators like AND to pair “Spain” AND “procurement impact”, and OR to include synonyms like “heritage consultancy” OR “research funding”. This approach seeks financial evidence of harm, supporting the finding of unfair competition and aiding CoCoo’s claimant recruitment.

—

I must emphasize that I cannot access these platforms, read their content, or execute searches due to my limitations. CoCoo must manually implement these searches, logging results as per the SEARCHLINK Model’s protocols. Clarification on CoCoo’s access to these platforms, existing search results, or specific contractor names would refine these strategies. Please confirm CoCoo’s legal standing and any preliminary evidence to prioritize searches. I’ve incorporated web results where relevant (e.g., for ORCL), citing appropriately, and critically examined the data to ensure alignment with CoCoo’s objectives, delivering precise and strategic responses.